[Answer] Why do some patient safety leaders such as Dr. David Bates believe the definition of harm should be broader than the definition in the IHI Global Trigger Tool?

Quesiton : Why do some patient safety leaders such as Dr. David Bates believe the definition of harm should be broader than the definition in the IHI Global Trigger Tool?

Answer: C

Most relevent text from all around web: Why do some patient safety leaders such as Dr. David Bates believe the definition of harm should be broader than the definition in the IHI Global Trigger Tool? The Swiss cheese model of harm illustrates what important concept in patient safety ? B & C Why do some patient safety leaders such as Dr. David Bates believe the definition of harm should be broader than the definition in the IHI Global Trigger Tool ? Why do some patient safety leaders such as Dr. David Bates believe the definition of harm should be broader than the definition in the IHI Global Trigger Tool ? Because health care systems should work to prevent more types of harm than the current definition includes IHI Global Trigger Tool for Measuring Adverse Events (Second Edition) This white paper provides information on the development and methodology of the IHI Global Trigger Tool enabling the ability to accurately identify adverse events and measure the rate of adverse events over time. Dr . Frankel: The patient safety leaders have to take a complex set of constructs and be able to explain such concepts in simple and elegant ways that provide face validity The authors consider the term “medical care safety” as the ratio of the benefit for the patients...