[Answer] Why do some patient safety leaders such as Dr. David Bates believe the definition of harm should be broader than the definition in the IHI Global Trigger Tool?

Quesiton : Why do some patient safety leaders such as Dr. David Bates believe the definition of harm should be broader than the definition in the IHI Global Trigger Tool?

Answer: C

Most relevent text from all around web: Why do some patient safety leaders such as Dr. David Bates believe the definition of harm should be broader than the definition in the IHI Global Trigger Tool? The Swiss cheese model of harm illustrates what important concept in patient safety ? B & C Why do some patient safety leaders such as Dr. David Bates believe the definition of harm should be broader than the definition in the IHI Global Trigger Tool ? Why do some patient safety leaders such as Dr. David Bates believe the definition of harm should be broader than the definition in the IHI Global Trigger Tool? Because health care systems should work to prevent more types of harm than the current definition includes IHI Global Trigger Tool for Measuring Adverse Events (Second Edition) This white paper provides information on the development and methodology of the IHI Global Trigger Tool enabling the ability to accurately identify adverse events and measure the rate of adverse events over time. | David W . Bates MD MSC. Dr . Bates is an internationally renowned expert in patient safety using information technology to improve clinical decision-making quality-of-care cost-effectiveness and outcomes assessment in medical practice. A practicing general internist Dr . Bates is Chie...