ANSWERTRIVIA.COM: We ask you, humbly: don't scroll away.

Dear Reader, If you use ANSWERTRIVIA a lot, this message is for you. We're sure you are busy so we'll make this quick: Today we need your help. We don't have salespeople. We depend on donations from exceptional readers, but fewer than 2% give. If you donate just a coffee, lunch or whatever you can today, ANSWERTRIVIA could keep thriving. Thank you.
(Secure PayPal)
*Everything counts! No minimum threshold!
Thank you for inspiring us!

Enter Another Question

12/26/19

[Answer] Why did the US Supreme Court rule against the state of Tennessee in Baker v. Carr?

Answer: Tennessee had not redistricted since 1901 keeping rural districts in power.




Most relevant text from all around the web:


Why did the US Supreme Court rule against the state of Tennessee in Baker v. Carr? The Us supreme court rule against the state of Tennessee in baker v. Carr because Tennessee had not restricted since 1901. This keep the rural district in power and the supreme court was forced to rule against the state of Tennessee . 4.2. 10 votes. In 1971 the Minnesota State Supreme Court ruled against the right of same-sex couples to marry in Baker v. Nelson a decision that was upheld by the U .S. Supreme Court in 1972. Start studying C & P Voting. Learn vocabulary terms and more with flashcards games and other study tools. ... Why did the US Supreme Court rule against the state of Tennessee in Baker v. Carr ? Tennessee had not redistricted since 1901 keeping rural districts in power. Why did the Us supreme rule against the state of Tennessee in Baker v . Carr ? Tue Mar 21 2017 · Case Summary of Baker v. Carr: A Tennessee resident brought suit against the Secretary of State claiming that the failure to redraw the legislative districts every ten years as outlined in the state constitution resulted in rural votes holding more votes than urban votes. The state claimed redistricting was a political question and non-justiciable. Why Did The Us Supreme Court Rule Against The State Of Tennessee In Baker V. Carr ?: Front. Reveal the answer to this question whenever you are ready. Tennessee had not redistricted since 1901 keeping rural districts in power. Enter another q...

Disclaimer: 

Our tool is still learning and trying its best to find the correct answer to your question. Now its your turn, "The more we share The more we have". Comment any other details to improve the description, we will update answer while you visit us next time...Kindly check our comments section, Sometimes our tool may wrong but not our users.


Are We Wrong To Think We're Right? Then Give Right Answer Below As Comment
Posted by at

No comments:

Post a Comment

Subscribe to: Post Comments (Atom)