ANSWERTRIVIA.COM: We ask you, humbly: don't scroll away.

Dear Reader, If you use ANSWERTRIVIA a lot, this message is for you. We're sure you are busy so we'll make this quick: Today we need your help. We don't have salespeople. We depend on donations from exceptional readers, but fewer than 2% give. If you donate just a coffee, lunch or whatever you can today, ANSWERTRIVIA could keep thriving. Thank you.
(Secure PayPal)
*Everything counts! No minimum threshold!
Thank you for inspiring us!

Enter Another Question

10/25/20

[Answer] In Stanley v. Georgia (1969) the Supreme Court struck down a statute which made it a crime for an adult to possess what in their own home?a. marijuanab. illegal weaponsc. obscene materialsd. drug paraphernalia

Answer: c. obscene materials




Most relevant text from all around the web:


In Stanley v. Georgia (1969) the Supreme Court struck down a statute which made it a crime for an adult to possess what in their own home?a. marijuanab. illegal weaponsc. obscene materialsd. drug paraphernalia U.S. Supreme Court Stanley v . Georgia 394 U.S. 557 ( 1969 ) Stanley v . Georgia . No. 293. Argued January 14-15 1969 . Decided April 7 1969 . 394 U.S. 557. Syllabus. Under authority of a warrant to search appellant's home for evidence of his alleged bookmaking activities officers found some films in his bedroom. The films were projected and ... Stanley v . Georgia 394 U.S. 557 ( 1969 ) was a United States Supreme Court decision that helped to establish an implied "right to privacy" in U.S. law in the form of mere possession of obscene materials.. The Georgia home of Robert Eli Stanley a suspected and previously convicted bookmaker was searched by police with a federal warrant to seize betting paraphernalia . United States Supreme Court . STANLEY v . GEORGIA ( 1969 ) No. 293 Argued: Decided: April 7 1969 . Under authority of a warrant to search appellant's home for evidence of his alleged bookmaking activities officers found some films in his bedroom. The films were projected and deemed to be obscene . Appellant was arrested for their possession. Mon Apr 01 2019 · Stanley was later convicted criminally for possessing the obscene material and the Supreme Court of Georgia affirmed the conviction. The U.S. Supreme Court reversed. It held that the First Amendment prohibits making mere private possession of obscene material a crime . Stanley v . Georgia Case Brief. Statement of the Facts: In Stanley v . Georgia 394 U.S. 557 ( 1969 ) the Supreme Court held that the mere priva...


Disclaimer: 

Our tool is still learning and trying its best to find the correct answer to your question. Now its your turn, "The more we share The more we have". Comment any other details to improve the description, we will update answer while you visit us next time...Kindly check our comments section, Sometimes our tool may wrong but not our users.


Are We Wrong To Think We're Right? Then Give Right Answer Below As Comment

No comments:

Post a Comment