[Answer] How did the Supreme Court rule in the Miranda decision?

Answer: b. Ernesto Miranda had been denied his rights.

Most relevant text from all around the web:

How did the Supreme Court rule in the Miranda decision? Miranda v. Arizona - Wikipedia Miranda Rights Established - HISTORY Miranda v. Arizona Podcast | United States Courts Miranda v. Arizona - Wikipedia On June 13 1966 the Supreme Court issued a 5–4 decision in Miranda's favor that overturned his conviction and remanded his case back to Arizona for retrial. Five justices formed the majority and joined an opinion written by Chief Justice Earl Warren. The Court ruled that because of the coercive nature of the custodial interrogation by police (Warren cited several police training manuals that had not been provided in the arguments) no confession could be admissibl… Tue Jun 09 2020 14:30:00 GMT-0400 (Eastern Daylight Time) · On June 13 1966 the U.S. Supreme Court hands down its decision in Miranda v. Arizona establishing the principle that all criminal suspects must be advised of their rights before interrogation. ... Constitutional culture. Miranda was a constitutional decision ’ of the Supreme Court and thus impossible for a law passed by the Congress to overturn such a decision . There is no special justification that the Court avoid following the well-established precedent of Miranda . Chief Justice Antonin Scalia concluded that Miranda announced a constitutional rule that Congress may not supersede ... The Supreme Court ruled Sun Apr 04 2021 14:30:00 GMT-0400 (Eastern Daylight Time) in ...

Disclaimer: 

Our tool is still learning and trying its best to find the correct answer to your question. Now its your turn, "The more we share The more we have". Comment any other details to improve the description, we will update answer while you visit us next time...Kindly check our comments section, Sometimes our tool may wrong but not our users.

Are We Wrong To Think We're Right? Then Give Right Answer Below As Comment