[Answer] why sharecropping cropping was unfair?

Answer: Many plantation owners had stores where freedmen bought supplies such as seed fertilizer tools and even food clothing and medicine on credit

Most relevant text from all around the web:

why sharecropping cropping was unfair? Sharecropping is a legal arrangement with regard to agricultural land in which a landowner allows a tenant to use the land in return for a share of the crops produced on that land.. Sharecropping has a long history and there are a wide range of different … The crop -lien system was a credit system that became widely used by cotton farmers in the United States in the South from the 1860s to the 1930s. Sharecroppers and tenant farmers who did not own the land they worked obtained supplies and food on credit from local merchants. The merchants held a lien on the cotton crop and the merchants and landowners were the first ones paid from its sale. Sharecropping is a term for when one person farms another person's land and then the two share what is produced. Sharecroppers are almost always poor and are often in debt to landowners or other people. Sharecropping was very common in the Southern United States after the Civil War and the end of slavery.At that time many African-Americans sharecropped on the land that they had once farmed ... Yes that means that sharecropping would not have existed that does not however mean Sherman and the data are not related to sharecropping or why sharecropping was decided on as a "solution". If ...

Disclaimer: 

Our tool is still learning and trying its best to find the correct answer to your question. Now its your turn, "The more we share The more we have". Comment any other details to improve the description, we will update answer while you visit us next time...Kindly check our comments section, Sometimes our tool may wrong but not our users.

Are We Wrong To Think We're Right? Then Give Right Answer Below As Comment