[Answer] why sharecropping cropping was unfair?

Answer: Many plantation owners had stores where freedmen bought supplies such as seed fertilizer tools and even food clothing and medicine on credit

Most relevant text from all around the web:

why sharecropping cropping was unfair? In settler colonies of colonial Africa sharecropping was a feature of the agricultural life. White farmers who owned most of the land were frequently unable to work the whole of their farm for lack of capital. They therefore had African farmers to work the excess on a sharecropping basis. In South Africa the 1913 Natives' Land Act outlawed the ownership of land by Africans in areas designated for white ownership and effectively reduced the status of most sharecroppers to tenant farmersand then to farm l… The crop -lien system was a credit system that became widely used by cotton farmers in the United States in the South from the 1860s to the 1930s. Sharecroppers and tenant farmers who did not own the land they worked obtained supplies and food on credit from local merchants. The merchants held a lien on the cotton crop and the merchants and landowners were the first ones paid from its sale. This was called sharecropping and initially the benefits were mutual. The land owner would pay for the seeds and tools in exchange for a percentage of the money earned from the crop and a portion of the crop . As time passed many landowners began to abuse this system. Sep 29 2006 · Ned left his father's house to begin sharecropping on his own at the age of 19; he married and began a family about the same time. Real...

Disclaimer: 

Our tool is still learning and trying its best to find the correct answer to your question. Now its your turn, "The more we share The more we have". Comment any other details to improve the description, we will update answer while you visit us next time...Kindly check our comments section, Sometimes our tool may wrong but not our users.

Are We Wrong To Think We're Right? Then Give Right Answer Below As Comment